By He Xiaping, trip coordinator
On July 19, 40 students, two teachers and two school administrators from Loudi No. 1 Middle School, Hunan Province, along with their vice principal, director and two other English teachers were greeted by their host families at Fourth Baptist Church School in Plymouth. Thus began their nine-day visit to Minnesota, a trip they have been vying for with hundreds of other students from Loudi during the past year.
This group of students (equivalent of U.S. high school freshmen) were selected from the school’s international study classes. Their participation is voluntary and their families paid all their trip expenses.
By Greg Hugh -
The American Association of University Professors (AAUP) has joined a growing chorus* of voices calling on North American universities to rethink their relationship with Confucius Institutes (CI), the international chain of [Chinese] state-sponsored Chinese-language programs embedded in partner schools abroad, whose policies critics say are anathema to academic freedom. In a statement issued by the AAUP, it asserts “North American universities permit Confucius Institutes to advance a state agenda in the recruitment and control of academic staff, in the choice of curriculum, and in the restriction of debate.”
Evidently there is also some doubt within China as to whether or not funding for the Confucius Institutes can be better spent at home educating its own rural citizens. Recently, Chinese Vice Premier Liu Yandong read aloud a letter written by President Xi Jinping at a ceremony in Beijing celebrating the 10th anniversary of the Confucius Institute (CI) program. The letter was celebratory, lauding the CIs “unremitting efforts for world peace and international cooperation.” The effort is certainly there: the reach of CIs, which teach Chinese language and culture, has grown immensely. In the program’s 10 years of existence, the Hanban - a Chinese government agency affiliated with the Ministry of Education and responsible for managing the program - has established 457 CIs and 707 Confucius Classrooms (a related program designed for primary and secondary schools) around the globe. By the end of 2013, CIs had attracted 850,000 registered students since China first established a CI in South Korea in 2004. But despite eye-catching numbers, the CIs have been anything but an unqualified success. Not only have American partners begun fighting back against what they view as threats to academic freedom, many Chinese also view the soft-power initiative as a waste of money.
China's influence threatens American universities, experts say http://t.co/kyFWKVMGTF
By Yongling Zhang-Gorke, contributor
During the past several years, we have witnessed the growth of Chinese programs in K-12 schools in Minnesota, especially those in the 12 affiliated Confucius Classrooms. As schools grow their Chinese program, so does the need for establishing stronger connections with Chinese schools and obtaining deeper understanding of the Chinese education system. The need is reflected in the following three areas:
1) Partner with a sister school in China for concrete activities such as exchange of students and teachers
2) Get knowledge about the latest trend in curriculum reform in China, especially on core subjects of Chinese language, math, and science, which have implications for Mandarin immersion programs
3) Understand and compare teacher development in both U.S. and China to better support in-service development for the Chinese language teachers in the U.S.
By Chang Wang, contributor
[Editor’s note: This is the final remarks of Professor Chang Wang to “Legal Research in American Law: The Westlaw Approach” class at China University of Political Science and Law, the largest law school in the world. Wang is chief research and academic officer at Thomson Reuters, the world’s leading source of intelligent information for businesses and professionals. Since 2007, Wang has been lecturing legal research based on West’s Analysis of American Law and Westlaw at top law schools in the U.S., China and Europe. His lectures also have been viewed widely online at Erya Education and Chaoxing Academic Videos, two premier online learning providers in China. His bilingual textbook “Legal Research in American Law,” dedicated to the University of Minnesota and Thomson Reuters where the author “found and read the law”- is a bestseller on Amazon China. The lecture was delivered on July 4, 2014. China Insight has exclusive rights to publish this article in its entirety.]
First and foremost, I’d like to thank all of you for joining me to explore the fascinating world of American law and Westlaw™/WestlawNext™.
As I’m sure you remember, we started our journey by comparing common law and civil law.
As a common law country, the United States and its legal system are deeply rooted in precedent, or Stare Decisis, relying heavily on courts’ interpretations of both codified law and previous judicial opinions. This doctrine of precedent helps ensure the predictability, consistency and integrity of the American legal system.
In contrast, notwithstanding its civil law framework, current Chinese law is a “socialist legal system with Chinese characteristics,” a legal system designed to support “socialism” and the Chinese Communist Party (CPC). In China, the law is used primarily as a tool to reinforce party rules and strengthen its policies; the party itself operates outside the law.
By Jodi Yim James, Staff Writer
The Chinese character 福fú means Good Fortune or Blessings. 福fú is one of the most popular Chinese characters and it is used to decorate everywhere during the celebration of the Chinese New Year. 福fú is also commonly posted artistically on a permanent plaque or framed painting inside homes with the intended message of "Blessings" or "Bless This House."